the UDRP and the Rules designate only four organizations for above resolution.These organizations are the ADNDRC, the National Arbitration Forum, the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Department of the World Intellectual Property Organization (” WIPO “), and …

the UDRP and the Rules designate only four organizations for above resolution.These organizations are the ADNDRC, the National Arbitration Forum, the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Department of the World Intellectual Property Organization (” WIPO “), and …

the UDRP and the Rules designate only four organizations for above resolution.These organizations are the ADNDRC, the National Arbitration Forum, the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Department of the World Intellectual Property Organization (” WIPO “), and …

the UDRP and the Rules designate only four organizations for above resolution.These organizations are the ADNDRC, the National Arbitration Forum, the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Department of the World Intellectual Property Organization (” WIPO “), and …

the UDRP and the Rules designate only four organizations for above resolution.These organizations are the ADNDRC, the National Arbitration Forum, the Domain Name Dispute Resolution Department of the World Intellectual Property Organization (” WIPO “), and …

WIPO Domain Name Decision for cantoruk.com … Read more from WIPO Domain Name Decisions

CircleID has posted a link to a new WIPO report on UDRP cases the domain name dispute resolution provider handled in 2005. A copy of the report is available here.

“‘Notwithstanding the unique effectiveness of the UDRP as a global remedy against cybersquatting, the fact that WIPO’s caseload in 2005 was the highest in four years and that many of these cases concern recently registered domain names, underlines the need for continued vigilance by intellectual property owners,’ said Mr. Francis Gurry, Deputy Director General of WIPO who oversees the work of the Center. He further noted that, while WIPO’s experience shows that UDRP disputes are heavily concentrated in the .com domain, attention must also be paid to the establishment of robust preventive mechanisms against abusive registration in new gTLDs. ‘If domain names are randomly attributed in new domains, intellectual property owners will be forced to compete with cybersquatters for their own trademarks – unless additional preventive safeguards are introduced,’ he added.”