<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UDRPlaw.net &#187; Arbitration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.udrplaw.net/en/udrp/tag/arbitration/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.udrplaw.net</link>
	<description>The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Legal Information Site</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:29:08 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>hourly</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>1</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>DNAttorney.com Study Reveals imbalance in UDRP Panellist Participation and Outcomes at NAF</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/dnattorney-com-study-reveals-imbalance-in-udrp-panellist-participation-and-outcomes-at-naf.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/dnattorney-com-study-reveals-imbalance-in-udrp-panellist-participation-and-outcomes-at-naf.html#comments</comments>
		<pubdate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:39:13 +0000</pubdate>
		<dc:creator>Fairness Advocate</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispute Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNAttorney.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain name lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ICANN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet governance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Arbitration Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panelist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zak Muscovitch]]></category>

		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In their recent study performed by DNAttorney.com, Zak Muscovitch, a domain name lawyer and publisher of the report, has presented statistical information gathered from public record that helps to illustrate a skew in panelist assignment. Muscovich says &#8220;The National Arbitration Forum has provided years of service in trademark and domain name disputes. Greater transparency is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their recent study performed by DNAttorney.com, Zak Muscovitch, a domain name lawyer and publisher of the report, has presented statistical information gathered from public record that helps to illustrate a skew in panelist assignment.</p>
<p>Muscovich says</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The National Arbitration Forum has provided years of service in trademark and domain name disputes. Greater transparency is required in order to explain the concentration of cases amongst certain panelists. ICANN should revisit the Rules and require that panel appointment is always random. Otherwise, there will be an apprehension of an unfair process amongst some observers and stakeholders who believe that the selection of the panellist is of paramount importance and has a substantial likelihood of affecting the outcome of cases. To increase discussion of these and other domain dispute issues, we have created a free sign-up to receive daily NAF Case Update so that you can receive daily notices of new NAF decisions.&#8221; </p></blockquote>
<p>They have compiled statistics which we hope will provide the domain name dispute community with an idea of the approximate participation levels of all NAF Panelists. </p>
<p>Link: <a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-report-domain-name-dispute-stats-reveal-concern-over-panelist-appointment-88825337.html>http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/new-report-domain-name-dispute-stats-reveal-concern-over-panelist-appointment-88825337.html</a></p>
<img src="http://www.udrplaw.net/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=142&amp;ts=1328537615" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/><div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="small-count" data-url="http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/dnattorney-com-study-reveals-imbalance-in-udrp-panellist-participation-and-outcomes-at-naf.html"></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentrss>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/dnattorney-com-study-reveals-imbalance-in-udrp-panellist-participation-and-outcomes-at-naf.html/feed</wfw:commentrss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New NAF Supplemental Rules Begin January 1</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-naf-supplemental-rules-begin-january-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-naf-supplemental-rules-begin-january-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubdate>Fri, 09 Dec 2005 00:08:13 +0000</pubdate>
		<dc:creator>Historical Post</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispute Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Arbitration Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>

		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Arbitration Forum is updating its Supplemental Rules for the UDRP and other domain name disputes, effective January 1, 2006. For more information, read here: http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/NAFSupplementalRules.asp Update &#8211; At first glance, changes include an increase in the supplemental filing fee from $250 to $400 (with a new proof of service requirement), a new $100 re-initiation fee, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana;">The National Arbitration Forum is updating its <a style="color: #6699cc;" href="http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/udrp/rules_010106.asp">Supplemental Rules</a> for the UDRP and other domain name disputes, effective January 1, 2006. For more information, read here: <a style="color: #6699cc;" href="http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/NAFSupplementalRules.asp">http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/NAFSupplementalRules.asp</a></span></p>
<p>Update &#8211; At first glance, changes include an increase in the supplemental filing fee from $250 to $400 (with a new proof of service requirement), a new $100 re-initiation fee, and increased filing fees. For 1-2 domain names, the new filing fee is $1300 (from $1150).</p>
<img src="http://www.udrplaw.net/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=41&amp;ts=1328537615" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/><div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="small-count" data-url="http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-naf-supplemental-rules-begin-january-1.html"></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentrss>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-naf-supplemental-rules-begin-january-1.html/feed</wfw:commentrss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrity/Personal Name UDRP Decision Roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/uncategorized/celebritypersonal-name-udrp-decision-roundup.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/uncategorized/celebritypersonal-name-udrp-decision-roundup.html#comments</comments>
		<pubdate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:45:56 +0000</pubdate>
		<dc:creator>Historical Post</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carnie Wilson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Arbitration Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Link Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Western Classics B.V.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHOIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whois Privacy Protection Service Inc.]]></category>

		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Two new decisions issued by the National Arbitration Forum: CarnieWilson.com - Carnie Wilson v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. a/k/a Whois Agent, NAF Case FA417186 (Mar. 29, 2005). KarlLagerfeld.com - Asian and Western Classics B.V. v. New York Link, Inc., NAF Case FA422746 (Mar. 30, 2005). Both domain names have been ordered transferred to their respective celebrity/personal [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Verdana;">Two new decisions issued by the National Arbitration Forum:<br />
CarnieWilson.com - <a style="color: #6699cc;" href="http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/417186.htm">Carnie Wilson v. Whois Privacy Protection Service, Inc. a/k/a Whois Agent, NAF Case FA417186 (Mar. 29, 2005).</a></span></p>
<p>KarlLagerfeld.com - <a style="color: #6699cc;" href="http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/422746.htm">Asian and Western Classics B.V. v. New York Link, Inc., NAF Case FA422746 (Mar. 30, 2005).</a></p>
<p>Both domain names have been ordered transferred to their respective celebrity/personal name trademark owners.</p>
<img src="http://www.udrplaw.net/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=72&amp;ts=1328537616" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/><div style="float:left;margin:0px 0px 0px 0px;"><a title="Post on Google Buzz" class="google-buzz-button" href="http://www.google.com/buzz/post" data-button-style="small-count" data-url="http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/uncategorized/celebritypersonal-name-udrp-decision-roundup.html"></a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.google.com/buzz/api/button.js"></script></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentrss>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/uncategorized/celebritypersonal-name-udrp-decision-roundup.html/feed</wfw:commentrss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
