UDRPlaw.net » Reverse Hijacking http://www.udrplaw.net The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Legal Information Site Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:00:00 +0000 en hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 The Chronicles of Electronic Commerce: Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/the-chronicles-of-electronic-commerce-reverse-domain-name-hijacking-under-the-uniform-dispute-resolution-policy.html http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/the-chronicles-of-electronic-commerce-reverse-domain-name-hijacking-under-the-uniform-dispute-resolution-policy.html#comments Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:34:30 +0000 Fairness Advocate http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=137 The Social Science Research Network has a new title listed called “The Chronicles of Electronic Commerce: Reverse Domain Name Hijacking Under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy” by Zinatul A. Zainol.

The Abstract:

Reverse Domain Name Hijacking is a unique concept under the Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy. Its main purpose is to protect domain name registrants against unjustified claims of overreaching trademark rights by allowing domain name registrants, in some limited circumstances to retort against trademark owners.

Looks interesting…

pixelstats trackingpixel]]> http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/the-chronicles-of-electronic-commerce-reverse-domain-name-hijacking-under-the-uniform-dispute-resolution-policy.html/feed 0 The Smells of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/the-smells-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking.html http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/the-smells-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking.html#comments Tue, 17 Jan 2006 21:48:39 +0000 Historical Post http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=27 It has been awhile since a UDRP panelist issued a decision in support of Reverse Domain Name Hijacking against a trademark owner. The latest RDNH decision involves the domain name AROMA.COM. In a decision issued January 16, 2006, Panelist John J. Upchurch determined that Mirama Enterprises, Inc. dba Aroma Housewares Company “attempted to abuse the administrative process to wrest control of Respondent’s domain name and take over the domain name registration.” The decision is Mirama Enterprises, Inc. dba Aroma Housewares Company v. NJDomains, Abuse Contact:abuse@mail.com c/o Gerald Gorman, NAF Case FA588486 (Jan. 16, 2006).

pixelstats trackingpixel]]> http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/the-smells-of-reverse-domain-name-hijacking.html/feed 0