<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UDRPlaw.net &#187; WIPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.udrplaw.net/en/udrp/category/udrp/dispute_providers/wipo/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.udrplaw.net</link>
	<description>The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy Legal Information Site</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 09:00:00 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updateperiod>hourly</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>1</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New WIPO Report on UDRP Cases</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-wipo-report-on-udrp-cases.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-wipo-report-on-udrp-cases.html#comments</comments>
		<pubdate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:14:36 +0000</pubdate>
		<dc:creator>Historical Post</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dispute Providers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cybersquatting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name speculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domain name system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Francis Gurry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Intellectual Property Organization]]></category>

		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CircleID has posted a link to a new WIPO report on UDRP cases the domain name dispute resolution provider handled in 2005. A copy of the report is available here. &#8220;&#8216;Notwithstanding the unique effectiveness of the UDRP as a global remedy against cybersquatting, the fact that WIPO’s caseload in 2005 was the highest in four years and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.circleid.com/posts/wipo_responds_to_significant_cybersquatting_activity_in_2005/">CircleID</a> has posted a link to a new WIPO report on UDRP cases the domain name dispute resolution provider handled in 2005. A copy of the report is available <a href="http://www.wipo.int/edocs/prdocs/en/2006/wipo_pr_2006_435.html">here</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8216;Notwithstanding the unique effectiveness of the UDRP as a global remedy against cybersquatting, the fact that WIPO’s caseload in 2005 was the highest in four years and that many of these cases concern recently registered domain names, underlines the need for continued vigilance by intellectual property owners,&#8217; said Mr. Francis Gurry, Deputy Director General of WIPO who oversees the work of the Center. He further noted that, while WIPO’s experience shows that UDRP disputes are heavily concentrated in the .com domain, attention must also be paid to the establishment of robust preventive mechanisms against abusive registration in new gTLDs. &#8216;If domain names are randomly attributed in new domains, intellectual property owners will be forced to compete with cybersquatters for their own trademarks – unless additional preventive safeguards are introduced,&#8217; he added.&#8221;</p>
<img src="http://www.udrplaw.net/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=24&amp;ts=1283709375" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/><div id="ratebox_24" style="height: 18px;"><a style="cursor: pointer;" onclick="loadContent(this, 'like', '24');">Like</a> - <a style="cursor: pointer;" onclick="loadContent(this, 'dislike', '24');">Dislike</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentrss>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/new-wipo-report-on-udrp-cases.html/feed</wfw:commentrss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Finnish Company &amp; Town Join Forces in UDRP Win</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/finnish-company-town-join-forces-in-udrp-win.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/finnish-company-town-join-forces-in-udrp-win.html#comments</comments>
		<pubdate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:53:37 +0000</pubdate>
		<dc:creator>Historical Post</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Complainant Win]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UDRP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIPO]]></category>

		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=29</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a WIPO decision issued December 14, Raisio PLC and the Finnish Town of Raisio joined forces in a UDRP victory issued against the Korean registrant of Raisio.com. The case is a departure from other UDRP decisions involving city names. Raisio plc and Town of Raisio v. Lee Joohee, Yang Youngho, WIPO Case D2005-1041 (Dec. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a WIPO decision issued December 14, Raisio PLC and the Finnish Town of Raisio joined forces in a UDRP victory issued against the Korean registrant of Raisio.com. The case is a departure from other UDRP decisions involving city names.</p>
<p><a href="http://arbiter.wipo.int/domains/decisions/html/2005/d2005-1041.html">Raisio plc and Town of Raisio v. Lee Joohee, Yang Youngho, WIPO Case D2005-1041 (Dec. 14, 2005)</a>.</p>
<img src="http://www.udrplaw.net/wp-content/plugins/pixelstats/trackingpixel.php?post_id=29&amp;ts=1283709375" style="display:none;" alt="pixelstats trackingpixel"/><div id="ratebox_29" style="height: 18px;"><a style="cursor: pointer;" onclick="loadContent(this, 'like', '29');">Like</a> - <a style="cursor: pointer;" onclick="loadContent(this, 'dislike', '29');">Dislike</a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentrss>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/finnish-company-town-join-forces-in-udrp-win.html/feed</wfw:commentrss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
