<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for UDRPlaw.net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.udrplaw.net/de/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.udrplaw.net</link>
	<description>Die Uniform Domain Name Streit Auflösung Richtlinie rechtliche Hinweise Website</description>
	<lastbuilddate>Fri, 19 Februar 2010 22:54:55 +0000</lastbuilddate>
	<sy:updateperiod>hourly</sy:updateperiod>
	<sy:updatefrequency>1</sy:updatefrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Gerechtigkeit Anwalt</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerechtigkeit Anwalt</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Fri, 19 Februar 2010 22:54:55 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Just looked really quickly at WIPO and only found 8 caes in 2008, 13 in 2009, für eine Gesamtmenge von 21 if I am not missing anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just looked really quickly at WIPO and only found 8 caes in 2008, 13 in 2009, für eine Gesamtmenge von 21 if I am not missing anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Gerechtigkeit Anwalt</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerechtigkeit Anwalt</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Fri, 19 Februar 2010 22:44:19 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Appreciate the comments @Constantine, @Anonymous.

Auch, for another perspective on this read here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/19/minds-machines-new-gtlds-will-cause-only-316-new-cases-of-cybersquatting/#comments&quot; target=_new rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MBH at TheDomains.com has a post about the Minds + Machines findings&lt;/ein&gt;.  He suggests that it is worth expanding:  
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;the perspective in to ccTLDs that have launched as open as well, like .me&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;does not take into consideration the legal fees around preparation of a UDRP&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;could incorporate how many cease and desist letters are sent by tm holders resulting in a transfer prior to UDRP&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;the number of court cases filed by tm holders or those costs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;

It also seems reasonable to perhaps quantify &lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;the many, many areas where a possible dispute was resolved by friendly (as opposed to visceral) first contact.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;A higher level of ethical conduct being illustrated by &#039;domainers&#039; (ie the Internet Commerce Association Code of Conduct) reducing the number of claims&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The impacts of Yahoo or Google blacklisting infringing names reducing the attraction of infringing registrations&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;

With the exception of including &#039;open&#039; ccTLDs, (we will look into this), many of the data points are worth considering but are not necessarily quantifiable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Appreciate the comments @Constantine, @Anonymous.</p>
<p>Auch, for another perspective on this read here:<br />
<a href="http://www.thedomains.com/2010/02/19/minds-machines-new-gtlds-will-cause-only-316-new-cases-of-cybersquatting/#comments" target=_new rel="nofollow">MBH at TheDomains.com has a post about the Minds + Machines findings</a>.  He suggests that it is worth expanding:  </p>
<ul>
<li>the perspective in to ccTLDs that have launched as open as well, like .me</li>
<li>does not take into consideration the legal fees around preparation of a UDRP</li>
<li>could incorporate how many cease and desist letters are sent by tm holders resulting in a transfer prior to UDRP</li>
<li>the number of court cases filed by tm holders or those costs</li>
</ul>
<p>It also seems reasonable to perhaps quantify
<ul>
<li>the many, many areas where a possible dispute was resolved by friendly (as opposed to visceral) first contact.</li>
<li>A higher level of ethical conduct being illustrated by &#8216;domainers&#8217; (ie the Internet Commerce Association Code of Conduct) reducing the number of claims</li>
<li>The impacts of Yahoo or Google blacklisting infringing names reducing the attraction of infringing registrations</li>
</ul>
<p>With the exception of including &#8216;open&#8217; ccTLDs, (we will look into this), many of the data points are worth considering but are not necessarily quantifiable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Constantine Roussos (.Musik)</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine Roussos (.Musik)</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Fri, 19 Februar 2010 19:22:18 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-117</guid>
		<description>This is great research. The findings are not a surprise at all. Deep inside everyone knows the truth and a lot of time is wasted on developing perfect policies on things that do not have a great impact on society or brands. Too bad the attorneys of big brands try to hide the real truth from their clients and charge them for it.

Constantine
.music</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great research. The findings are not a surprise at all. Deep inside everyone knows the truth and a lot of time is wasted on developing perfect policies on things that do not have a great impact on society or brands. Too bad the attorneys of big brands try to hide the real truth from their clients and charge them for it.</p>
<p>Constantine<br />
.Musik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von anonyme domainer</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>anonyme domainer</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 18 Februar 2010 11:14:12 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Die UDRP braucht eine Generalüberholung.  it is being seriously abused by reverse hijackers to steal domains from people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Die UDRP braucht eine Generalüberholung.  it is being seriously abused by reverse hijackers to steal domains from people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Gerechtigkeit Anwalt</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerechtigkeit Anwalt</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 18 Februar 2010 11:11:26 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-112</guid>
		<description>@ Fred F, @ Zach - Wir arbeiten auf die Validierung dieser Forschung.  Abgeschlossene Mittag sollte 2/18.

@ Troung - Lügner ist ein starkes label, perhaps presenting &quot;the truth through a filter&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Fred F, @ Zach &#8211; Wir arbeiten auf die Validierung dieser Forschung.  Should be completed midday 2/18.</p>
<p>@ Troung &#8211; Lügner ist ein starkes label, Vielleicht präsentieren &#8220;die Wahrheit über einen filter&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Zach</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Zach</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 18 Februar 2010 11:05:39 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-111</guid>
		<description>keine Überraschung auf diese Erkenntnisse.

Jemand hat eine Menge Zeit zu gehen durch alle Informationen, Sicher.  Sieht aus wie die Menschen, die die Studie haben Pro-neue TLD, Obwohl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not a surprise at these findings.</p>
<p>Jemand hat eine Menge Zeit zu gehen durch alle Informationen, Sicher.  Sieht aus wie die Menschen, die die Studie haben Pro-neue TLD, Obwohl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Troung</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Troung</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 18 Februar 2010 11:03:45 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Warum liegen an Anwälte so viel?!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warum liegen an Anwälte so viel?!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Neue TLDs und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Marken. von Fred F</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/new_tlds/brands-and-newtlds-and-udrp.html/comment-page-1#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred F</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Thu, 18 Februar 2010 11:02:53 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=124#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Kein Schocker.  Froh zu sehen, dass jemand hat die Initiative zu tun alle, die Forschung.  Ich schaute auf NAF und WIPO und es sieht aus wie eine lange Zeit zu tun haben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kein Schocker.  Froh zu sehen, dass jemand hat die Initiative zu tun alle, die Forschung.  I looked at NAF and WIPO and it looks like that took a long time to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Single Letter Domain Names von Single Letter .COMs &#124; Blog.TiaWood.com</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/single-letter-domain-names.html/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Single Letter .COMs &#124; Blog.TiaWood.com</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Wed, 02 Dezember 2009 16:37:25 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/?p=37#comment-107</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/single-letter-domain-names.html [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/single-letter-domain-names.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/governance/icann/single-letter-domain-names.html</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Kommentieren Standards der UDRP Handling von Zak Muscovitch</title>
		<link>http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/standards-of-udrp-handling.html/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Zak Muscovitch</dc:creator>
		<pubdate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:30:46 +0000</pubdate>
		<guid ispermalink="false">http://www.udrplaw.net/udrp/udrp/standards-of-udrp-handling.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>Sehr interessant und gut geschriebene Artikel. Vielen Dank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sehr interessant und gut geschriebene Artikel. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
